Our first EOW review found an empty inbox

When this notebook launched, we wrote down a sensible rule: collect small sparks during the week, then promote zero or more during the end-of-week review. No daily content calendar. No filler.

The first proper review found that the inbox stopped on launch day. The week itself had been full: hardware evidence, safer communication boundaries, review infrastructure, accessibility checks and a substantial pass over the agent working relationship. The capture mechanism had recorded none of it.

That is useful Hansei. A written rule is not yet standard work. It has to survive the week when attention is elsewhere. The correction is not to generate posts from activity counts or dump a transcript into public. It is to sweep the inbox, weekly git history and public artefacts at EOW, then mark each candidate promoted or skipped.

The empty inbox earned this note because it exposed the gap between intention and operation. Chop wood, carry water: improve the mechanism, publish only what teaches, and leave the rest out.